Compare Wallets

Cross-wallet correlation with strength and confidence reported separately.

Evidence families

  • Funding — shared or chained funding sources
  • Transfers — direct transfer relationships
  • Counterparties — overlap in interacted wallets
  • Entities — overlap in known entities
  • Behavior — behavioral similarity
  • Protocol Sequences — similar protocol sequences
  • Temporal Correlation — timing patterns

Correlation strength vs confidence

Correlation strength answers "how strong are the observed relationship signals?" Confidence answers "how reliable is the available evidence?" AEGIX keeps them separate and never conflates them.

Population commonality

Shared counterparties and entities carry less correlation weight when they are common across the AEGIX-observed population. Overlap is always reported against the AEGIX observed population, never the whole Solana network.

Canonical pair

A comparison of (A, B) is the same as (B, A). AEGIX uses a canonical pair identity so reverse comparisons reuse the same persisted result instead of duplicating expensive work.

Correlation indicates observable linkability. It does not establish common ownership or real-world identity.